黃偉民易經講堂 新引渡條例開啓恐怖時代 逃犯條例 大陸説你有罪 香港便要交人 香港履霜 堅冰至 李家超演活憲問篇 憲問篇第十四 20190219

分享
嵌入
  • 添加 2019年02月19日
  • 美人遲暮2035年香港變大灣區四大金剛。借港人涉嫌在台灣謀殺女友案,逼香港修訂新引渡條例,以後就靠特首一人政治把關?特首和法院,是否有拒絕中共的空間?李家超只著眼四百多萬年薪,忘了香港人的福祉,新引渡條例一旦實行,香港將進入一個恐怖時代。(完整文字版將會在節目後上載至易經講堂網頁)
    #逃犯條例 #大灣區 #送中 #引渡條例 #三權合作
    ==========
    如若你喜歡「易經講堂」節目,覺得內容有益世道人心,希望你能繼續收看、讚好、「訂閱及推介」易經講堂CNclip頻道,集腋可以成裘,謝謝支持與鼓勵。
    易經講堂有限公司
    香港上環郵政局郵政信箱33249號
    I Ching Consultancy Limited
    Sheung Wan Post Office P.O. Box 33249, 1/F West Exchange Tower, 322-324 Des Voeux Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
    網頁 Website: wmwong730.wordpress.com/gift
    電郵 Gmail: IChingConsultancyLtd
    ==========
    Wong Wai Man 2019年2月19日 星期二下午5:00pm
    香港特區政府,要修訂《逃犯條例》,目的是使香港和大陸,可以互相引渡刑事疑犯。
    一位在本港沒有觸犯任何法例的香港市民,因大陸政府,提出移交要求,香港便要開始下列程序:
    1. 特首發出「授權進行書」,拘捕當事人;
    2. 法院發出拘捕令;
    3. 法院聽取大陸政府的移交申請後,決定是否發出「拘押令」;
    4. 特首最後發出「移交令」。
    這個修訂《逃犯條例》的法院,不是高等法院,是地方裁判法院。
    但香港,是中國大陸的特別行政區,不是獨立國家,特首和法院,是否有拒絕中共的空間?
    借港人涉嫌在台灣謀殺女友的案件,逼香港市民和議員開快車,修訂這個新引渡條例,以後就靠特首一人政治把關?裁判法院拒絕大陸法院的申請?
    #乾坤兩卦解香港世情
    《周易》六十四卦以乾坤開始,乾為天,是宇宙的規律;坤為地,是建構在乾卦自強不息的基礎上,發展出具體的人群社會。
    乾卦講創始,坤卦講有終。
    中華文化追求的,不只有終,而且要能夠終而復始。生命總會結束,但可以留低一個典範,將你的結束帶動新一代的開始。終而復始,就是《周易》的基本概念。
    #履霜堅冰至
    #龍戰于野其血玄黃
    #地雷復卦找回初心
    坤卦的第一支爻:履霜。堅冰至。
    最後一支爻:龍戰于野,其血玄黃。
    一開始履霜,就要防最後的堅冰結果。
    履霜的時候,堅冰還未來,但要推想,冬天馬上要來了,要警覺。
    坤卦第一支爻初六爻,將這支陰爻變為陽爻,便是地雷復卦。
    一陽復始,找回初心。
    坤卦初爻出現,履霜,這個時候警惕,立即行動,將陰爻變成陽爻,便是一陽復始的地雷復卦。否則,任由形勢發展下去,一爻一爻的便到最後一爻的乾坤大戰。龍戰於野,其血玄黃。陽剛陰柔,兩敗俱傷,這便是堅冰至了。
    卦象是資源在大量流失,百年辛苦經營,要毀於一旦了。
    #子罕篇第二十七章
    #歲寒然後知松柏之後凋也
    子罕篇第二十七章,子曰:「歲寒,然後知松柏之後凋也。」
    歲暮天寒,然後才知道松柏是最後凋零的樹啊!
    時代的大風浪來臨時,人格能夠挺然不動,不受物質環境的影響,不因為社會時代不同而變動。
    我最愛這章的「歲寒」二字,一年中總有最寒冷的日子,這是最艱難的時候,也是上天給予你大演身手的舞台。
    #李家超推動新引渡條例
    #香港的恐怖時代
    易經講堂上星期開始,說到第十四篇「憲問」,開始原憲問孔子,什麼才是「可恥」,子曰:邦有道,穀。邦無道,穀,恥也。
    孔子說:
    社會上了軌道,讀書人應該出仕,服務社會,做公僕,負起大丈夫的責任。
    但當社會混亂,公義不彰,仍戀棧官位,沒有貢獻,甚或為虎作倀,那便是可恥了。
    抽象的大道理,給今日保安局局長李家超演活了。
    香港的官員,未必能推卻北京要求的政治任務,但李家超不能只著眼那四百多萬的年薪,而忘了香港人的福祉,你心中應該明白,新引渡條例一旦實行,香港將進入一個怎樣恐怖的時代。
    2019年2月19日星期二下午5:00
    你的收看、訂閱、讚好便是對「易經講堂」的支持,謝謝。

评论 • 117

  • sacred weeds
    sacred weeds 6 个月 前

    遊戲王油膩boy法老王都屬陰的 黃帝是陰木 帝王都是陰濕黑暗的

  • T T
    T T 7 个月 前

    不單拉人
    大6仲可以通過港司法部凍結港人一切資產

  • T T
    T T 7 个月 前

    妖婆以為隻手遮天!!
    一人可置全港市民生死

  • Ddd Jfdnc
    Ddd Jfdnc 7 个月 前 +1

    各位港商,您們好,
    有一天大喜訊敬告豬位,
    豬帝有旨欲修法例以便抄各位家,相信各位必定雀躍不已,惟是法例之通過成功與否,端賴豬位投票贊成,是故屆時各位務必踴躍投票,支持法例之通過。
    此外,由於抄家過程繁複,包括如何充公爾等財產物業、販賣爾等子女、強姦爾等妻女等,故投票後請留步共商各抄家細節,屆時希各位踴躍提供寶貴意見,以便抄家行動能暢通無礙,是所至囑。

    謹謝各位鼎力支持!!!

  • Denny Chiu
    Denny Chiu 7 个月 前

    靠呢隻孽蛾把關?嘥Q氣,呃鬼食豆腐

  • Anthony Wong
    Anthony Wong 8 个月 前

    信的唔死都幾難,妹子可以同主人講NO????

  • Aw wai 11
    Aw wai 11 8 个月 前

    HK should start to stop all the scumbags from disturbing the order of the society.

  • Cheung Yin
    Cheung Yin 9 个月 前

    言不符實,這些出事的工程的總承建商和工程監理是澳洲禮頓和外商。落手做才是中資工程公司和本地公司。

    • ampmma 1980
      ampmma 1980 8 个月 前

      唔通澳洲公司就揾D鬼佬工人同你 落手做 咩!

    • ampmma 1980
      ampmma 1980 8 个月 前

      邊個做唔係問題!係質素問題!

    • ampmma 1980
      ampmma 1980 8 个月 前

      傻佬!D什麼澳洲公司揾幾鬼佬做樣,後面大陸佬話事!知你地喜歡鬼佬咪做比你地睇囉!

  • Duk Lun Ham
    Duk Lun Ham 9 个月 前 +2

    條例可能不單是香港市民,是任何身處香港的人,包括洋人用持外國護照的人士!

  • Oi wai Leung
    Oi wai Leung 9 个月 前 +2

    其實最有貢獻是在和合石和所有墳場過身的先人。他們是在香港最窮困的日子打拼,為全家人生計拼搏,開枝散葉,當香港經濟起飛,才有我70-90年代的我們,我們是身成在香港最富裕的時代,我自問冇他們毅力和氣,為全家人傾盡全力,令下一代有安穩生活。我只能自求多褔,希望可以解決自己生活就算,我好多謝上幾代人的貢獻,希望他們早登極樂。😇

  • Oi wai Leung
    Oi wai Leung 9 个月 前 +4

    強國時常巧立明目消取香港位置,遲早自食其果,為咗自利破壞早期中國人,來香港艱辛發展過百年基業,簡直對吾住幾代香港人貢獻和服務社會的先人。😢😭

  • Oi wai Leung
    Oi wai Leung 9 个月 前 +2

    黃教授要食史立消喉糖,漁夫之寶喉糖,現在流感高鋒期要小心口喉,氣管等問題。儘量用滴露消毒纸巾,要食生冷食物,飲熱檸水加鹽。

  • Peter Hui
    Peter Hui 9 个月 前 +4

    中國對香港是掠奪者, 賊, 強盗, 土匪山賊本質從無改變過, 每日強行塞入香港150+隻大劣人, 另加每年6000+搶奪香港學童的學位的大劣生, 再加其它名義入殖香港, 97後每年至少殖民香港七至八萬人 ; 又修改及掠奪香港海域, 更反過來要香港交租, 再加一地两檢, 賣屎水, 大白象工程, 搶奪香港人職位包括大學, 公務員, 公營機構,..... 以無恥也難以形容中国, 此渣滓国只有輸出災難, 令人氣憤, 看吧, 必有天譴徹底消滅此地球公害 !

  • 肯德基亂噏29
    肯德基亂噏29 9 个月 前 +4

    基本法寫明不實行社會主義,香港被規劃就係社會主義!

  • Annann Ann
    Annann Ann 9 个月 前

    林病搏命宣傳大弯区、区长一定係距。

    • lisa
      lisa 9 个月 前 +1

      如果英國把企餓的家人取消英國藉,企餓會點?

  • laihoi
    laihoi 9 个月 前 +6

    柒婆成家都係英國人,話撚知你香港仆街死啦!最緊要而家執行任務,撈埋最後一筆留嚟醫 cancer!

  • George Law
    George Law 9 个月 前 +7

    林鄭政府指鹿為馬、語言偽術樣樣精,想把大灣區包裝為三藩市Bay Area,要幾好有幾好,信一乘雙目失明。

  • 大波蓮論政Linda
    大波蓮論政Linda 9 个月 前 +5

    阿婆走得快,一定有古怪!

  • Flop Flip
    Flop Flip 9 个月 前

    只有賊會擔心被引渡 大家又看看誰會最反對?

    • Ddd Jfdnc
      Ddd Jfdnc 8 个月 前

      港商和大陸商人有競爭或糾紛,
      又可羅織罪名引渡港商入大陸審。

    • Ddd Jfdnc
      Ddd Jfdnc 8 个月 前

      解放初期大陸迫害知識分子,
      他們逃難到香港,
      如果有引渡條例,
      他們也會被引渡回大陸。
      知識分子又是賊?

    • Duk Lun Ham
      Duk Lun Ham 9 个月 前 +1

      只有賊才怕法例、才怕獨裁者?
      劉少奇、彭德懷、林彪...趙紫楊...,他們怕的,又是什麼?他們為何麼有這樣的下場?
      薄熙來、劉曉波、李旺陽..、過千個的大陸維權律師,他們怕的又是什麼?
      他們都是賊?孫正財也是賊?

  • Annann Ann
    Annann Ann 9 个月 前 +7

    請林病班子遲官帶頭往大弯区效忠祖(英)国先啦!

  • Qun liu
    Qun liu 9 个月 前 +5

    走得快好世界!賣股賣樓走去非洲都要喇!

  • Kaho Whon
    Kaho Whon 9 个月 前 +1

    反共人士最驚安份守己無有怕

  • eddy chow
    eddy chow 9 个月 前 +2

    还不块走? "祸不空生自己招" , 不走的? 就自招 "死亡"

  • Annann Ann
    Annann Ann 9 个月 前 +5

    某教会中学同样黑暗、家族營运、用人唯亲、朋党乡里自己人分贓玩哂!非我族类便要埋堆、唔係就無好日子过甚至跳樓、使用公帑的教会中学变了私營同乡会中学了!

    • スタンキー
      スタンキー 5 个月 前

      雖然你用簡體字, 但講的都是現今香港的寫照, 絕對讚同! 大公司/細公司 本身已是這樣營運, 集團與集團之間亦如是, 龐斷後再攝權操控公司或市場以求獲取豐厚利潤, 始作俑者可能也想不到這後果, 但真影響深遠!!

    • MG A
      MG A 9 个月 前 +2

      Annann Ann 可否畀D提示。

  • Rc4558 Ne5532
    Rc4558 Ne5532 9 个月 前 +5

    某官重聲稱要把握大懶區既機會, 真香港被消滅既機會??
    被全方位殖民? 被破壞法治? 被炒高成世界第一難頂樓價?, 被鄰近無聊人等窮遊霸佔破壞山水? 被搶福利醫療? 被三權合作?
    哀我香港, 名存實亡, 指鹿為馬, 大灣無港

  • FateAndTheFuture
    FateAndTheFuture 9 个月 前 +9

    看到好幾位朋友在這裡留言,奉勸港人無為廢時,抗拒中共透過香港的庸官,逐步削去香港的法治基礎,勸大家不如快快想辦法移民好過啦。
    但是,移了民又如何?能夠真正解決問題嗎?我們移民,中共的紅二代,中共的野蠻流氓,都會跟我們移民,然後就以他們可惡,囂張,的行為,使當地人對所有華人發生厭惡,反感。這種情緒最終會升級為反華行動。暫時這種民粹還未普遍出現,還受制於現行的政治正確潮流。但一旦外國的經濟環境再轉差,到了臨界點,反華情緒就會爆發。即使美國,不是今天也出了個特朗普總統嗎?
    一個國家,一個地區的苛政,就像個壓力煲,到了人民忍無可忍時就會爆。移民就是讓壓力煲能夠泄氣,讓獨裁者有更大的空間,和更長的壽命。試想一吓,如果當年大陸人可以大舉移民海外,又點會出現學生佔領天安門呢?
    最諷刺的,移了民之後,我們會不甘被當地白人歧視,覺得很受侮辱,漸漸就忘記了迫我們走上移民之路的那個獨裁政權,反而變成 “愛祖國” 起來,變成以祖國今天強大了而感到驕傲和光榮,在鬼子老面前威翻吓。所以話,中共政權最喜歡反對它的人移民的,因為中共心知遲早這班人都會 “精神回歸” 它的懷抱的,成為在海外最支持它的一鼓勢力。

    • 窑
       8 个月 前

      我們y2k 移民澳洲,開始時擔心孩子失去學習中華民化的機會,孩子成績一般,普通大學畢業,做普通的工,但讀書,生活開心,自由,靈活,愈大愈思想合理成熟。我們非常珍惜这裏生活。感恩。

    • callMeEarly
      callMeEarly 9 个月 前

      Not exactly, I experienced those happy with "精神回歸" only happen to the Mainlanders, I see none happened to the ones from Hong Kong.
      On the contrast, many HK overseas are feeling sick what the CCP have done to HK.
      I'd say 'glass heart' only happens to the Mainlanders and always thought they are being racist! They are brain-washed, but we HKer ain't.
      Can't say what would happen to the next generation of HK people, since 國民教育 is actually already happening!
      So, for your kids' sake, move or not?

  • Poon Happy
    Poon Happy 9 个月 前 +5

    新引渡條例凌駕23條立法,後果堪慮,劫運。

  • ki hung mo
    ki hung mo 9 个月 前 +6

    🤬買港共賊淋病鵝正冚家剷⋯害港害民正扑街西

  • Ms Ms
    Ms Ms 9 个月 前 +2

    將這個相對自由文明的地方徹底破壞了

  • Brenda Tang
    Brenda Tang 9 个月 前 +1

    將逃犯(刑事)移交返大陸。如果你不要發生,你咪上大陸囉!咁咪無人「屈」到你。

    • Chan Joe
      Chan Joe 9 个月 前 +2

      Brenda, 大陸官方機構話要拉人就拉人,唔洗同你解釋咁多。

    • frankie lam
      frankie lam 9 个月 前 +1

      Brenda, 請你不要太天真,需要到甚麼罪名都可以比你。

    • Tin Chiping
      Tin Chiping 9 个月 前 +3

      砌人生豬肉共產黨世界第一👍👍👍

    • yy Ho
      yy Ho 9 个月 前

      Brenda Tang 引渡法通過後,李波被認為犯了大陸法,特首夠膽不簽遞解令咩?

  • Brenda Tang
    Brenda Tang 9 个月 前

    香港政府點解同台灣政府合作?

  • Jupistar1
    Jupistar1 9 个月 前 +5

    要集體打企鵝呢隻小人

  • Jupistar1
    Jupistar1 9 个月 前 +3

    Hi Master Wong!!!!!

  • Brenda Tang
    Brenda Tang 9 个月 前 +1

    「罪犯」逃返香港,你又可以點?又點樣解決呢個問題?小則偷貓,大則殺人,點樣解決?不是主要指台灣和香港嗎?因香港人在台灣犯刑事而觸發,怪得誰?!自己香港人衰格,一切都順水推舟啫,怪得誰!

    • Zeitgeist Movement
      Zeitgeist Movement 9 个月 前 +1

      天天有大碌人大媽大叔做水貨走私奶粉日用品,海關見-個捉-個,全部重判重罰走私罪囉!鬼叫你班賤精走私呀,怪得誰?

  • Mike Leung
    Mike Leung 9 个月 前 +7

    黃sir 天👍地👍人👍

  • 支蝗
    支蝗 9 个月 前 +5

    呢條條例 太撚過份啦,會逼好多人 雞飛狗走

  • Hi Chow咁叻講嘢唔去做律師死都講番生人渣

    不會。因為是買港賊。正識乃共。賺夠鬆人。有外照。會知道是紙屎片。

  • andy tsang
    andy tsang 9 个月 前 +7

    其實沒什麼好說的,打從80年代中英談判開始,魔鬼已將鬼爪伸進來,而家只不過是明目張膽,肆無忌憚的用粗手段去蹂躪它!

  • Ms Ms
    Ms Ms 9 个月 前 +18

    好傷心,一個本來可以安居樂業,相對自由文明的地方,就因為一班全無廉恥,祇求自身利益的敗類,令香港沉淪到這地步,悲哀!

    • C.K. Wai
      C.K. Wai 9 个月 前

      puppets are bad; puppeteers are worst ?

  • KA LEONG LAU
    KA LEONG LAU 9 个月 前 +6

    移民門檻最低好像是希臘 有一百幾十萬身家就得 用有生之年以移民外國為目標吧

    • Chan Joe
      Chan Joe 9 个月 前

      Tin, 但習總經常示意話要攞台湾呀!

    • Tin Chiping
      Tin Chiping 9 个月 前 +1

      台灣吧 始終文化差距唔大

  • niu lu
    niu lu 9 个月 前 +5

    2047已經嚟咗 玩完 使撚立廿三條咩 一個大彎區就攪掂香港啦

  • niu lu
    niu lu 9 个月 前 +4

    大彎區係豬頭攪嘅 佢識條鉄咩 層 次高低 三七識條毛咩

  • Philip Lam
    Philip Lam 9 个月 前 +8

    首先,有錢不代表文明(食人族的酋長可以穿金帶銀),視乎錢的來處。
    文明與不文明之別:你覺得是好,佢認為是壞;佢覺得正,你會不屑。當文明有普世共識,對方又執意另樹一套,不幸,而他又是你的家長,你只好選擇:離家出走,或者,同流合污,比他污得更高明,又或者,叫鄰近一眾正義之士,幫拖!
    香港人,沉默是最差選擇。

    • Philip Lam
      Philip Lam 9 个月 前 +1

      @Lau Yes,您說的是事實一面。首先,您真覺得自己有把刀嗎。其次對方恃的是糖衣炮彈。您有咆吼的心嗎,哀莫大於心死啊,大家起來,檢示下自己的裝備,不做沉默的羔羊!

    • KA LEONG LAU
      KA LEONG LAU 9 个月 前

      家長有槍 仔得把刀 點樣發聲

  • Andy Kwok
    Andy Kwok 9 个月 前 +3

    唉算把啦香港

  • Albert Wun
    Albert Wun 9 个月 前 +6

    感謝感恩。

  • Hui Ivan
    Hui Ivan 9 个月 前 +10

    黃師父,豬年開心快樂,現以到了不聽您的講堂以不能了,好過上大學了。

  • Calo WONG
    Calo WONG 9 个月 前 +7

    法律,,資訊自由,流通貨幣落差太大。香港只被利用?!

  • Susanna Yeu
    Susanna Yeu 9 个月 前 +9

    多謝黃老師上了一課獲益良多

  • Kenny Leung
    Kenny Leung 9 个月 前 +7

    老師好嘢一針見血見地過人。

  • Yvonne LEUNG
    Yvonne LEUNG 9 个月 前 +9

    謝謝,非常喜歡聽你的分析

  • Thiny1991
    Thiny1991 9 个月 前

    The whole China expansionist policy smells of ...
    east asia co prosperity sphere

  • callMeEarly
    callMeEarly 9 个月 前 +5

    有引渡條例後,
    23 條 立不立法, 再不重要,
    因為國家話你犯了內地法律, 香港就可拉人, 移交!
    跟本萬能係 KEY!
    快 D 取消 "香港關係法" 啦, 等佢地種瓜得瓜, 檻炒吧啦!

    • creamcolouredponies
      creamcolouredponies 9 个月 前

      You also neglected to mention that the CCP members' need to money launder in HK is precisely a key driver for our skyhigh property prices. Yet you seem to want more of this to happen in order to create the pressure cooker condition you would like to see that would allow real revolution to happen. That may well be your wish but I would rather we save and protect what we can of Hongkong rather than just destroy everything unique and good about us just to foment a revolution that you favour. To be honest your instinct and strategy could only really be described as Maoist, and I really have no time for that nor I think would most Hongkongers if they realise that is your true intention behind your proposal to get rid of the Hongkong Policy Act.

    • creamcolouredponies
      creamcolouredponies 9 个月 前

      Your proposal of the abolition of the HK Policy Act is a clear example of what we in Cantonese called "cutting our toes off to avoid the leeches". You may think you are being very clever with your suggestion. I have seen nothing in your comments above that would persuade me that that is indeed the case.
      You also neglected to mention that the CCP members' need to money launder in HK is precisely a key driver for our skyhigh property prices. Yet you seem to want more of this to happen in order to create the pressure cooker condition you would like to see that would allow real revolution to happen. That may well be your wish but I would rather we save what we can of Hongkong rather than just destroy everything unique and good about us just to foment a revolution that you favour. To be honest your instinct and strategy could only really be described as Maoist, and I really have no time for that nor I think would most Hongkongers if they realise that is your true intention.

    • creamcolouredponies
      creamcolouredponies 9 个月 前

      Why are you so adamant to get rid of the one solid, concrete thing that ties Hongkong to the rest of the world, that allow us to act as our own sovereign without being tied to the Chinese Communist Party????? If you think that no international community would come to our aid when we are directly tied to the US via the HK Policy Act, why the heck would you assume that they would care more once Hong Kong become just another regional city indistinguishable from any other Chinese city in our independent foreign links????
      Tell you what, I have FAR MORE TRUST in the possibility of Hongkong getting help from foreign governments than we would EVER get from the Chinese Communist Party.
      I do agree with you that money laundering is hurting the Chinese government now, as the CCP is deprived of cash. That is precisely why I argued foreign seizures of CCP member's overseas assets is a far more effective way of targetting Honglong traitors. Why the fuck would you imagine that the foreign governments who seized these assets are going to return them to the Chinese Communist Party??????? Get real. Did the US /UK governments who seized Russian oligarchs' assets returned these monies to Putin???????? So how the fuck would you imagine that my proposal of overseas asset seizures would benefit the CCP??????? So stop misrepresenting my positions to pretend to argue against something that is only in your imagination, rather than what I have actually said and what actual international examples have shown.
      My very reasonable contention has always been that we would use scorched earth tactic as a very, very last resort, that we should not get rid of our international ties unless in extremis, and certainly not as a rather foolish way to try to hurt the rich oligarchs selling our city to the CCP. Your proposal of the abolition of the HK Policy Act is a clear example of what we in Cantonese called "cutting our toes off to avoid the leeches".
      You may think you are being very clever with your suggestion. I have seen nothing in your comments above that would persuade me that that is indeed the case.

    • creamcolouredponies
      creamcolouredponies 9 个月 前

      I will just say that our views differ significantly over your preference for a scotched earth tactic for Hongkong. Your positions have shifted constantly on this thread: your first comment called for the scorched earth via the abolition of the HK Policy Act. When I queried why you would advocate scorched earth tactic when that is exactly what the CCP wants to achieve, you replied saying that actually the HK Policy Act only benefits the status quo and that getting rid of it would only hurt the rich and powerful. When I thanked you for your clarification but asked further if you might be too optimistic about the lack of collateral damage caused by getting rid of the HK Policy Act, and suggested perhaps we could start first with calling for assets of the TNC class to be seized, citing concrete examples of how these have already been done by Western governments of both Russian and Chinese oligarchs in recent months, you turned around and accuse me of unseasoned naivete about world affairs, what a laugh.
      Please stop moving goalposts and realise that you yourself are in fact also requesting international help by essentially asking Trump/US government to abolish the HK Policy Act in your desire to use a scotched earth policy on Hongkong. Who is the naive one then if you are in fact aware that Trump would only pursue things in his own interests? Why should he listen to you? You haven't got ANY concrete real-life examples of the Trump administration listening to anyone but Trump himself, while I was able to offer you concrete real-life examples of foreign asset seizures of money-laundering oligarchs by not just the US government but also UK and Australia (there are many more examples in fact). Yet you seem to see yourself as more au fait of how the real world works despite evidence to the contrary. Why is that?
      Your latest comments now completely contradict your earlier comment, by positioning yourself as someone who really love HK and wants it to do well. Could I ask you, that if you are in fact serious about your proclamation about your love of our city, why are you so keen of the scotched earth tactic??????? Why are you so adamant to get rid of the one solid, concrete thing that ties Hongkong to the rest of the world, that allow us to act as our own sovereign without being tied to the Chinese Communist Party????? If you think that no international community would come to our aid when we are directly tied to the US via the HK Policy Act, why the heck would you assume that they would care more once Hong Kong become just another regional city indistinguishable from any other Chinese city in our independent foreign links???? Tell you what, I have FAR MORE TRUST in the possibility of Hongkong getting help from foreign governments than we would EVER get from the Chinese Communist Party. I agree with you that money laundering is hurting the Chinese government now, as the CCP is deprived of cash. That is precisely why I argued foreign seizures of CCP member's overseas assets is a far more effective way of targetting Honglong traitors. Why the fuck would you imagine that the foreign governments who seized these assets are going to return them to the Chinese Communist Party??????? Get real. Did the US /UK governments who seized Russian oligarchs' assets returned these monies to Putin???????? So how the fuck would you imagine that my proposal of overseas asset seizures would benefit the CCP??????? So stop misrepresenting my positions to pretend to argue against something that is only in your imagination, rather than what I have actually said and what actual international examples have shown. My very reasonable contention has always been that we would use scorched earth tactic as a very, very last resort, that we should not get rid of our international ties unless in extremis, and certainly not as a rather foolish way to try to hurt the rich oligarchs selling our city to the CCP. Your proposal of the abolition of the HK Policy Act is a clear example of what we in Cantonese called "cutting our toes off to avoid the leeches". You may think you are being very clever with your suggestion. I have seen nothing in your comments above that would persuade me that that is indeed the case.

    • creamcolouredponies
      creamcolouredponies 9 个月 前

      @CallmeEarly, I only realised you have replied to my comments just now.
      Let me say firstly, that you should refrain from attempting personal attacks where possible. I really have no time for your condescension (i.e. this sentence, "You should know more about human nature or you're just too young and as naive as a 左膠. ") You have no idea who I am and I won't be foolish enough to divulge my personal details on an open platform, but suffice it to say there is just as good a chance that I am older and know more about the way the world works than you do, even though you are already assumimg yourself to be an "old seafood" (HK slang) in comparison to me in your comments above. Let me just say that those who assume themselves to be cleverer and wiser than their counterpart always are in fact the most clueless. Take Xijinping as an example.
      I will just say that our views differ significantly over your preference for a scotched earth tactic for Hongkong. Your positions have shifted constantly on this thread: your first comment called for the scorched earth via the abolition of the HK Polivy Act. When I queried why you would advocate scorched earth tactic when that is exactly what the CCP wants to achieve, you replied saying that actually the HK Policy Act only benefits the status quo and that getting rid of it would only hurt the rich and powerful. When I thanked you for your clarification but asked further if you might be too optimistic about the lack of collateral damage caused by getting rid of the HK Policy Act, and suggested perhaps we could start first with calling for assets of the TNC class to be seized, citing concrete examples of how these have already been done by Western governments of both Russian and Chinese oligarchs in recent months, you turned around and accuse me of unseasoned naivete about world affairs, what a laugh.
      Please stop moving goalposts and realise that you yourself are in fact also requesting international help by essentially asking Trump/US government to abolish the HK Policy Act in your desire to use a scotched earth policy on Hongkong. Who is the naive one then if you are in fact now aware that Trump would only pursue things in his own interests? Why should he listen to you?
      You haven't got ANY concrete real-life examples of the Trump administration listening to anyone but Trump himself, while I was able to offer you concrete real-life examples of foreign asset seizures of momey-laundering oligarchs by not just the US government but also UK and Australia (there are many more examples in fact). Yet you seem to see yourself as more au fait of how the real world works despite evidence to the contrary. Why is that?
      Your latest comments now completely contradict your earlier comment, by positioning yourself as someone who really love HK and wants it to do well. Could I ask you, that if you are in fact serious about your proclamation about your love of our city, why are you so keen of the scotched earth tactic???????
      Why are you so adamant to get rid of the one solid, concrete thing that ties Hongkong to the rest of the world, that allow us to act as our own sovereign without being tied to the Chinese Communist Party????? If you think that no international community would come to our aid when we are directly tied to the US via the HK Policy Act, why the heck would you assume that they would care more once Hong Kong become just another regional city indistinguishable from any other Chinese city in our independent foreign links????
      Tell you what, I have FAR MORE TRUST in the possibility of Hongkong getting help from foreign governments than we would EVER get from the Chinese Communist Party.
      I agree with you that money laundering is hurting the Chinese government now, as the CCP is deprived of cash. That is precisely why I argued foreign seizures of CCP member's overseas assets is a far more effective way of targetting Honglong traitors. Why the fuck would you imagine that the foreign governments who seized these assets are going to return them to the Chinese Communist Party??????? Get real. Did the US /UK governments who seized Russian oligarchs' assets returned these monies to Putin???????? So how the fuck would you imagine that my proposal of overseas asset seizures would benefit the CCP???????
      So stop misrepresenting my positions to pretend to argue against something that is only in your imagination, rather than what I have actually said and what actual international examples have shown.
      My very reasonable contention has always been that we would use scorched earth tactic as a very, very last resort, that we should not get rid of our international ties unless in extremis, and certainly not as a rather foolish way to try to hurt the rich oligarchs selling our city to the CCP. Your proposal of the abolition of the HK Policy Act is a clear example of what we in Cantonese called "cutting our toes off to avoid the leeches". You may think you are being very clever with your suggestion. I have seen nothing in your comments above that would persuade me that that is indeed the case.

  • Helen Kung
    Helen Kung 9 个月 前 +4

    Dear Master Wong, please accept my sincere thanks for your wonderful lesson - From Sydney 2.34am.

  • 楊斌
    楊斌 9 个月 前 +3

    偶像 元宵節快樂 身體健康

  • Hakka
    Hakka 9 个月 前 +6

    Like !

  • Steven Wong
    Steven Wong 9 个月 前 +8

    叫妖蛾將DQ的議員移交俾大陸坐監,因為香港已經冇法律啦,祗有大陸才有fuck律!

    • creamcolouredponies
      creamcolouredponies 9 个月 前 +2

      DON'T give them anymore ideas. Political prisoners are a fact of life in Mainland China, it really isn't something to joke about.

  • Ruby Lai
    Ruby Lai 9 个月 前 +5

    易經乾坤兩卦解説⋯贊!

  • Jill Valentine
    Jill Valentine 9 个月 前 +3

    睇中共個樣仲可以玩多幾十年香港到左今時今日都係咁先
    大家快想辦法移民

  • Jill Valentine
    Jill Valentine 9 个月 前 +8

    都唔明佢地攪死左香港佢地有咩好處

    • Philip Lam
      Philip Lam 9 个月 前

      大6思維:香港我管的。這管當然包括管生管死,這是權力體現。其次,中國人店鋪,店前垃圾只管向外掃,管你行人、鄰店喜惡。我話OK就OK啦!

    • Fanny Chome
      Fanny Chome 9 个月 前

      佢哋唔係想搞死香港。香港有錢有勢力有特別嘅行政,最重要嘅係個Passport旅遊證件。好多中國嘅貪官就係利用呢一個小島你做佢自己可以做嘅非法行為,二個窮嘅政府又貪心着呢一個香港小島嘅錢。佢哋只係利用呢個香港,利用完後變成一個廢島。同其他中國細省份冇分別如果掘到渣都冇嗰個時候。啲樓價升得咁高咪就係佢哋搵大錢。跟住攞埋嘅旅遊證件你運走不錢囉。所謂山高皇帝遠,中國自從有皇帝以來都係有好多貪官。全世界到目前為止冇人新家多過貪官和珅貪返嚟嘅錢。

    • creamcolouredponies
      creamcolouredponies 9 个月 前

      Well they are taking full advantage of Hongkong as a money laundering heaven and our capacious monetary reserves and our technological know-how -- and once all these are gone and fully captured by CCP elites and diverted to other Mainland regions Hongkong would be a left-over husk devoid of any purpose like a used condom and be summarily dismissed, in that way we could never threaten the one-party regime that is the CCP. That is why the CCP must destroy Hongkong as our culture and history of self-governance is antithetical to the dominance of the Chinese Communist Party.

  • Tone E
    Tone E 9 个月 前 +4

    蛟龍飛天出洋海(香港),百年繁華壹夢消(永無返身之日。